THE COMPANIONS OF THE CONQUEROR
By G. Andrews Moriarty, AM LLB FASG FSA
of Ogunquit, Maine
[Copied from THE AMERICAN
GENEALOGIST, October 1944 V. 21 No. 2
Pages 111 - 113]
In his review of “The Falaise Roll” in The AMERICAN
GENEALOGIST, July 1939 (pp. 56-63), this writer pointed out
that a list of the tenants who can actually be proved to
have been present at the Battle of Hastings is a very small
one and must be based upon the named figures in the Bayeux
Tapestry and upon William of Poictiers and Guy of Amiens,
and the naming of certain persons by Orderic Vitalis, about
whom he may be presumed to have had special knowledge. He
further stated that the names recorded in the Roman de Rou
of Robert Wace, the Battle Abbey Roll and its derivatives,
the Dives Roll and the Falaise Roll cannot be accepted as
proof of a man’s presence at the battle. He further pointed
out that from certain other evidence a second list might be
compiled of persons who were most probably present and
expressed the hope that such lists would be compiled at some
future dale.
It is very gratifying to be able to state that two
such lists have at last been compiled by Prof. David Douglas
and have been printed in an English Periodical called
“History” for September 1943 (pp. 129-147) and it is a
matter of satisfaction to note that Prof. Douglas has, quite
independently, worked along the lines suggested in the
review. The first list of those whose presence at the battle
is assured, and which is in all probability final, consists
of twenty-seven names. The second list of those who were
probably present is based upon charter evidence, i.e., those
who attested Duke William’s charters under circumstances
which renders it most probable that they took part in the
expedition. This writer was pleased to note that among these
names Prof. Douglas lists Pons and suggests that he may be
the progenitor of the Cliffords, as was suggested in the
aforementioned review and still earlier in a note in the
Genealogical Department of the "Boston Transcript". Prof.
Douglas points out that his second list will probably be
enlarged after an intensive and critical study has been made
of the Norman charters, a thing which has not yet been done.
As these lists of Prof. Douglas are based upon
evidence, which, to this writer, seems conclusive it seems
well to place them before the American genealogical public,
as ones upon which there may he complete reliance.
List of those who were certainly at Hastings: (* indicates those from whom descent can be traced.)
*
Eustace Count of Boulogne
*
Robert Count of Mortain
*
WilIiam, son of Count Richard of Evreux
*
Geoffrey, son of Rotrou, Count of Mortagne anti Perche
Odo,
Bishop of Bayeux
Geoffrey, Bishop of Coutances
*
William fitz Osbern
*
Aimeri, Vicomte de Thouars, the Poictivin
*
Walter Giffard
*
Ralf de Toeni
(de Tosny)
*
Hugh de Montfort
*
Hugh de Grantmesnil
(de Grandmesnil)
*
William de Warenne
*
Robert, son of Roger de Beaumont
* William Malet
Gulbert d’Affray
Robert de Vitot
*
Engenulf
de 1’Aigle
Gerelmus de Panileuse
(*?) Robert fitz Ernis
Roger, son of Turold
Turstin, son of Rou
Erchembald, son of Erchembald the Vicomte
Vitalis
* Wadard
Taillefer
A member of the house of Ponthieu (“Pontivi nobilis haeres”).
Perhaps Count Gui I.
List of those witnessing Norman charters under
circumstances which render it most probable that they
accompanied time expedition:
* Gerald the Seneschal (grandfather of William de Roumare)
* Rodulf the Chamberlain (? de Tancarville)
Hugh d’Ivry, the Pincerna
*
Richard fitz
Gilbert (de Clare)
* Pons
In addition to these the following, who witnessed
Duke William’s charter made at Caen on 17 June 1066 (Gall.
Christ. XI, Instr. col. 59), were, I think, most probably at
Hastings:
*
Richard the Vicomte of the Avranchin
(father of Hugh Lupus)
* Ranulf the Vicomte of the Bessin
* Ralf Tesson
* Fulk d’Aunou
* Those from whom descent can be traced.
[Copied from THE AMERICAN
GENEALOGIST, October 1944 V. 21 No. 2
Pages 111 - 113]
Original will be found on the Sewell
Genealogy Site at
http://www.robertsewell.ca/conquest.html#companions
